•1 min read•from Machine Learning
What do reviewers actually mean when they say the paper sound more like a technical report? [D]
Hello,
I recently got my paper rejected from a workshop (big womp :'( ) .
Both reviewers said the paper sounds more like a technical report than a research paper.
I followed the usual computer vision format for papers so I'm a bit confused by what that might actually mean.
I would therefore like to hear the community's opinion on what faux pas make a paper read as technical report.
Thank you
[link] [comments]
Want to read more?
Check out the full article on the original site
Tagged with
#rows.com
#natural language processing for spreadsheets
#big data management in spreadsheets
#generative AI for data analysis
#Excel alternatives for data analysis
#big data performance
#technical report
#research paper
#computer vision
#reviewers
#rejected
#workshop
#community opinion
#faux pas
#format
#paper
#submission
#confusion
#readability
#feedback